Brandon Hall Research
    Sign up for "Brandon Hall News" and get free research downloads. Your privacy is assured.
    Your Email:

Home > Community > Shootouts > 2004 PowerPoint to E-Learning Shootout

Brandon Hall Research: 2004 PowerPoint to E-Learning Shootout
 
The Sponsors
Training logo
BHR logo

We held our first PowerPoint to E-Learning Shootout in February 2003. Back by popular demand, we had several requests to reprise the Shootout with the latest, greatest PowerPoint to e-learning tools. One thing we definitely learned is that the interest in using PowerPoint to create learning content has not diminished. In fact, audience attendance during this event was the highest of all Shootouts to date. This page lists the Shootout results for the 2004 edition of the PowerPoint to e-Learning Shootout, held during the Training Fall conference in San Francisco, Calif., October 11th, 12th, and 13th at Moscone Center (West).


Gallery

Audience, referee watch on giant screens
This competition was our largest ever, requiring two referees. Here, referee #2, Richard Nantel, stands vigil.

Hard at work with the clock ticking
The Learn.com team works while the clock counts down.

Team members during competition
The team from Impatica during the production process. Notice the 16 slides on their screen behind them.

One-man team records narration
The rules allowed teams of any size, as long as all development was done on a single computer. Here is the one-man team from Articulate.

Thumbs up
The Tegrity team takes a brief break from production to mug for the camera. Notice the video camera and headphone microphone. Tegrity placed in the Top 3 in the use of rich media category.

Referee Bryan Chapman
Bryan Chapman (and Richard Nantel), of Brandon Hall Research, served as referees for the event.

The convention expo
All development occurred live, in front of an audience made up primarily of classroom instructors and training managers. Each audience member had a ballot to rate each product in the four categories.


Gallery of Simulations

For vendors who create PowerPoint to e-learning products or other groups that specialize in converting PowerPoint content, we'd like to challenge you to take the source slides and make your own version of the content. You can download a copy of the source slides here. Convert the content, post it to your own Web server, then send the link to bryan@brandon-hall.com. Note: The PowerPoint file includes narrative text in the "notes" field that you can use for audio narration and/or on-screen text as desired. If the page is free of advertisements and does not require a log-in to run, we will post the link for others to see. We hope to make this a page that will serve as a test bed for what's possible when converting PowerPoint source material.

Here is a list of the companies that have taken us up on the challenge so far (since the previous PowerPoint to E-Learning Shootout). Click on the links to see how they converted the PowerPoint used in the Shootout competition.

Product (Company) Link to Software Simulation

KnowledgePresenter

(Kookaburra Studios Pty Ltd.)

Content Point

(Atlantic Link)

iPresentation

(Presenter Inc.)

PowerCONVERTER

(PresentationPro)

Custom Developed

(Instructional Endeavors)

OnPoint Learning Suite

(OnPoint Digital)

Name = Shootout, Password = Shootout

Intelladon

(Advanced Learning Platform)

AcroServices

(AcroTrain)

ViewletBuilder 3.5

(Qarbon)

MediaPod

(Vodium)

Mobular Technologies Inc.

(Mobular Engine)

Q-MultiMedia

Princeton Center

(ExpressTrain Transformation Suite)

PPT2HTML

(PP Tools)

Breeze

(Macromedia)

Send us your link today!

 
The Participants
Product Company Home Page
Articulate Presenter Articulate www.articulate.com
Camtasia Studio TechSmith www.techsmith.com
CourseMaker Studio Learn.com www.learn.com
EnQ Plus EnQ Plus www.enqware.com
Impatica for PowerPoint Impatica www.impatica.com
Macromedia Breeze Macromedia www.macromedia.com
OnPoint Learning Suite OnPoint Digital www.onpointdigital.com
Tegrity 6 Tegrity www.tegrity.com
ToolBook SumTotal Systems Inc. www.sumtotalsystems.net

Background

The format of the Shootout is really quite simple – take a 16-slide PowerPoint presentation (designed for classroom instruction) and convert it to an e-learning course. Did we mention that the entire task must be completed in 20 minutes.... in front of a live audience? And while you're at it, add some audio and/or video, throw in some interaction – and there you have it.

Okay, so it was a challenging task for the teams!

The Shootout took place over a three-day period, with three new teams competing each day. At the beginning of the each round of the Shootout, each team was handed a sealed envelope containing a CD-ROM (with a zipped copy of the 16-slide PowerPoint presentation) and a printed hard copy of the 16 slides for reference purposes.

A month before the competition, each team was given a practice version of the content. The subject was product knowledge training on an atomic clock, with facts, information, and tips for how to sell the clock to customers. The slides were not laid out as an e-learning course; rather, they are quite typical of what a classroom instructor might use as visuals during instructor-led training, with bulleted lists, graphics, progressive disclosures, and a few test questions (in linear format). The final copy of the slides were altered to make sure that no pre-work had been completed prior to the event.

Upon receipt of the new content, we started a 20-minute clock. Each team had to complete as much of the work as possible within the allotted 20 minute time frame.

The audience was able to watch each of the teams during development to (1) get a general idea of the workflow used by each team to convert the PowerPoint to e-learning, and (2) to verify that all work was done on-site.

Here is a summary of the 16-slides they received at the competition:

   

Debrief checklist:

Were you able to finish the entire simulation during the 20 minutes? If not, what percentage was completed?

What is the overall size of your completed work (file size)?

Tell us if you used audio and/or video in your output.

Describe the output created and output options. Is the converted material one large file? A series of separate files? Flash-based? HTML?

How do you price your system and/or conversion services? Desktop application? Enterprise system? What is the general price zone?

Show the course you created live and discuss how you handled each of the following:

  • What did you do with the narrative text located in the notes field of the PowerPoint?
  • Is the hyperlink on slide #3 still active?
  • How did you handle the transition effects and progressive disclosure (opening items one at a time) on slide #5?
  • What did you do with the embedded questions? Linear, interactive, feedback?
  • Any unique interaction that was added

Pick a few slides from the presentation and show us (real time) how they were converted.

Judging process:

Each product was rated on a 10-point scale in each category by the audience. Members of the participating companies were not allowed to rate their own products or others in the competition. The scores were averaged to derive the final score with winners announced in each category. Audience members enjoyed seeing the process of converting PowerPoint to e-learning first-hand. The competition was designed as a method for learning about what is possible. We saw a wide variety of approaches with different types of output.


Highest Overall Score

Product Company Score
1st Place Articulate Presenter Articulate 33.84
2nd Place Macromedia Breeze Macromedia 31.96
3rd Place Impatica for PowerPoint Impatica 30.16

Total range of scores was 23.84 to 33.84. Top score would be 40 points.


Ease of Use

Product Company Score
1st Place Impatica for PowerPoint Impatica 8.88
2nd Place Articulate Presenter Articulate 8.21
3rd Place Macromedia Breeze Macromedia 7.32

Total range of scores was 6.25 to 8.88. Top score would be 10 points.


Use of Rich Media

Product Company Score
1st Place Articulate Presenter Articulate 8.60
2nd Place Tegrity 6 Tegrity 8.10
3rd Place Macromedia Breeze Macromedia 8.02

Total range of scores was 6.20 to 8.60. Top score would be 10 points.


Interactivity

Product Company Score
1st Place Macromedia Breeze Macromedia 8.42
2nd Place Articulate Presenter Articulate 8.39
3rd Place ToolBook SumTotal Systems Inc. 7.56

Total range of scores was 5.70 to 8.42. Top score would be 10 points.


Most Innovative Approach

Product Company Score
1st Place Articulate Presenter Articulate 8.65
2nd Place Macromedia Breeze Macromedia 8.20
3rd Place Impatica for PowerPoint Impatica 7.76

Total range of scores was 5.60 to 8.65. Top score would be 10 points.

 
© 2008 Brandon Hall Research